Legal Opinion

In re M&P Collections, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided April 30, 2019No. CASE NO. 19-30311 (JOINTLY ADMINISTERED)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Alan C. Stout, United States Bankruptcy Judge

This case comes before the Court on the Application to Authorize Debtors to Employ Attorneys Nunc Pro Tunc (the "Application") filed by M & P Collections, Inc. ("M & P") and F & M Law Firm, P.S.C. d/b/a Fenton Law Firm, PSC ("F & M" and together with M & P referred to herein as "Debtors"). In the Application, the Debtors seek to employ Kaplan Johnson Abate & Bird, LLP ("KJAB") as counsel for the debtors- in-possession. The United States Trustee ("UST") objected to the Application. As discussed below, the Court concludes that KJAB does not possess…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In re BH & P Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  2. In Re Guy Apple Masonry Contractor, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1984
  3. In Re Bh & P, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
  4. Hassett v. McColley (In Re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  5. In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Easterday Ranches, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Washington · 2022
  2. In re: Adam T. LaloneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2025
  3. In re: Adam T. LaloneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2025
  4. Joshua Duvall and Brandi DuvallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API