Loewenthal v. Coonan
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
This action was brought to foreclose four several mortgages alleged to have been given by the defendant J. F. Coonan to the plaintiff, as security or indemnity to the plaintiff by reason of the said plaintiff having signed certain promissory notes as surety for said defendant Coonan. The appellant Mary Coonan and several others were made defendants, on the ground, as alleged in the complaint, that they claimed some interest in the premises covered by the mortgages, but which interest, if any, was subsequent and subject to said mortgages. From the judgment in favor of plaintiff the defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Yule v. BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Pleasant v. SamuelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Klokke v. EscaillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by13 opinions
- Regents of University of California v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Burrus v. CookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Wills v. WoolnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Brandtjen & Kluge v. FincherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Clegg v. EustaceIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.