Legal Opinion

Town of Wayland v. Attorney General of Commonwealth

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided March 10, 2014No. MICV201301173Published

1Opinion of the Court

Krupp, Peter B., J.

This case arises out of the adoption of a bylaw by the Town of Wayland (“the Town”) requiring a municipal determination that a utility is in compliance with state and federal law before the utility may apply pesticides or herbicides within a right of way in the Town. After the Attorney General concluded that the Pesticide Control Act, G.L.c. 132B, preempts the bylaw, the Town filed this action for certiorari. The Town now moves for judgment on the pleadings. For the following reasons, the Town’s motion is DENIED.

BACKGROUND

Utility companies need to control the growth of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. DiMarzo v. American Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Bloom v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. ColturiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  4. Town of Wendell v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Town of Reading v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API