Legal Opinion

Nida v. Echols

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided September 15, 1998No. 1:97-cv-00350PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARNES, District Judge.

This case is presently before the Court on defendants S. Cleve Ray, Charlene Echols and BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.’s (hereinafter “BellSouth”) Motion for Summary Judgment [12] and Motion to Strike the Expert Affidavit of Roger A. Roemmich [16]. After reviewing the record and the arguments of the parties, the Court concludes that defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [12] should be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART and Motion to Strike the Expert Affidavit of Roger A. Roemmieh [16] should be GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

In August of 1995, plaintiffs in this case,…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. H&R BLOCK EASTERN ENTERPRISES, INC. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Wolf v. RamseyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2003
  3. Gullatte v. Westpoint Stevens, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000
  4. Lee v. Necco, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2025
  5. Nicholson v. Waste Management LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API