Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Craner

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1939No. 6611Published

1Dissent

BU.DG-E, J.,

Dissenting. — The following statement of facts recited in the brief of the attorney general appears to be in all respects substantially correct and is adopted and approved as a statement of the material facts disclosed by the record:

“Appellants were convicted of grand larceny of an unbranded Hereford calf, and sentenced to serve a term of not less than one nor more than fourteen years in the Idaho State Penitentiary, from which judgment of conviction this appeal is made.
“The evidence establishes that the two appellants were in the vicinity of where the crime was committed on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. McLennanIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State v. MarrenIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  3. State v. OrrIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  4. State v. BondIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  5. State v. CorcoranIdaho Supreme Court · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API