Legal Opinion

Proctor v. Worthington Cylinder Corporation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 10, 2020No. 3:19-cv-08409Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TAOS PROCTOR, et al., Case No. 19-cv-08409-EMC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 9 v. MOTION TO REMAND 10 WORTHINGTON CYLINDER Docket No. 12 CORPORATION, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 Plaintiffs are Taos Proctor and Kelly Proctor, husband and wife. They have filed suit 15 against the following companies: (1) Worthington Cylinder Corp.; (2) The Coleman Company, 16 Inc.; (3) Walmart Inc.; and (4) Dignity Health. They have sued the first three companies 17 (collectively, the “Product Defendants”) because Mr.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer v. Snap-On Tools Corporation, Kenneth Baldwin and Keith A. Kaiser. Appeal of James F. Boyer and Mary R. BoyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Curtis Morgan v. Dow Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  4. Diaz v. Allstate Insurance GroupDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
  5. Willard v. United Parcel ServiceDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API