Legal Opinion
Willard v. United Parcel Service
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided January 10, 2006No. 1:05CV00554PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
OSTEEN, District Judge.
On November 16, 2005, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by Section 636.
Therefore, the Court need not make a de novo review and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is hereby adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiffs motion to remand (docket no. 5) is granted as to her request for remand, but denied as to her request for attorney’s fees, and this case is hereby remanded to the Superior Court…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Jacqueline Burns v. Windsor Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer v. Snap-On Tools Corporation, Kenneth Baldwin and Keith A. Kaiser. Appeal of James F. Boyer and Mary R. BoyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Patricia J. Mayes v. Stanley Rapoport Judith Rapoport David Key, D/B/A Key Coffee Roasters, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Proctor v. Worthington Cylinder CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- SPRIGGS v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATIONDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2023