Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Winkler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2005No. 88S00-0408-DI-346 and 88S00-0408-DI-347Published

1Opinion of the Court

834 N.E.2d 85 (2005)

In the Matter of Cynthia L. WINKLER, Respondent.

In the Matter of Blaine Goode, Respondent.

Nos. 88S00-0408-DI-346, 88S00-0408-DI-347.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

September 13, 2005.

Karl L. Mulvaney, Indianapolis, for the Respondents.

Donald R. Lundberg, Executive Secretary, Laura Beth Iosue, Staff Attorney, Indianapolis, for the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission.

2Per curiam

In this opinion, we find that the respondents, Cynthia L. Winkler ("Winkler"), Prosecuting Attorney, and Blaine Goode ("Goode"), Chief Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, for Washington County, violated Ind.…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Colman v. HeidenreichIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Matter of DrozdaIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. GranackiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  5. Matter of MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API