Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Harsch

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 24, 1981No. Appeal, No. 379 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Williams, Jr.,

This case comes before the Court on appeal by Ross Township of a common pleas court decision reversing the denial of a curative amendment proposal.

Appellees John and Joan Harsch operate a Grroup Day Care Home, a specific entity licensed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare (DPW) for the day care of more than six but less than twelve children, in the actual home of the adult care-giver(s). The township zoning ordinance conditionally permits family day care homes, provid*402ing care for no more than six children, in the R-l residential…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Railroad BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Hess v. Upper Oxford TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Horst v. Derry Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. HarschCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Allied Services for the Handicapped, Inc. v. Zoning & Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Reimer v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Borough of Dormont v. Bakopoulos, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1983
  5. In re AllenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API