Hughey v. CVS Caremark Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit Judge.
Paul Hughey (“Hughey”) appeals the grant of summary judgment to CVS Care-mark Corporation (“CVS”) in his employment discrimination claim pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”). The United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee found that Hughey failed to make a prima facie showing of age discrimination and that, even if Hughey established a prima facie case, he failed to show that CVS’s reason for terminating him was a pretext for age discrimination.
For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edward E. ERCEGOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Donald G. Wexler v. White's Fine Furniture, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- James P. Smith v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Seeger v. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shrivastava v. RBS Citizens Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017