Legal Opinion

Rattray v. Wickersheim Implement Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1918No. Civ. No. 2034PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

At the trial of this action the court granted the defendant’s motion for a nonsuit. Plaintiff’s appeal is from the judgment.

By his action the plaintiff seeks to recover commissions in accordance with an alleged oral agreement. William J. Wickersheim was the president and general manager of defendant company. A condensed statement of the plaintiff’s testimony is as follows: “In August, 1914, Mr. Wickersheim came to my office and asked me if I could get him a man who would invest some money in his company. He said if I would put him in touch with a party who was able and willing to invest some…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Northwestern Packing Co. v. WhitneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  2. Eddy v. American Amusement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API