Legal Opinion

United Dredging Co. v. United States ex rel. M. Sullivan Dredging Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 10, 1936No. 6800PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

The United Dredging Company entered into a contract with the United States to widen a part of the channel of St. Mary’s river. The specifications required the dredging out of a strip about 200 feet wide on the southwest side of the river at a designated point so that the channel at that point would be 500 feet wide at the bottom, with a minimum depth of 22 feet below water datum. The material to be removed consisted of sand, gravel, boulders, hardpan, and ledge rock. The work was divided into sections and was to bd paid for on a cubic yardage basis of material removed,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Freund v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Doyle v. . Rector, Etc., Trinity ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Forster v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. St. Louis Royalty Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  2. Swalley v. Addressograph Multigraph Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
  3. St. Louis Royalty Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API