Legal Opinion

Propst v. Propst

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1989No. S-2283PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

This appeal presents the question whether the superior court abused its discretion in refusing to modify an order requiring a non-custodial parent to pay post-majority educational child support.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Michael Propst and Judith Libby1 were married in 1965. They have three children: Christopher, born in 1966; Andrew, born in 1967; and Matthew, born in 1971.

Propst and Libby were divorced in 1974. They agreed that Libby would have custody of the children and that Propst would pay child support of $225.00 per month per child.

In 1981, Superior Court Judge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burrell v. BurrellAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Headlough v. HeadloughAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Dowling v. DowlingAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hinchey v. HincheyAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Lawrence v. LawrenceAlaska Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dewey v. DeweyAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Bunn v. HouseAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Dixon v. PouncyAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Ferguson v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. P.G.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Cox v. FloreskeAlaska Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API