Legal Opinion

Ciavarro v. Cost Control Marketing & Management, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 5, 1992No. 50PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

This is an appeal from a decree in equity which permitted rescission of a real estate transaction by the buyers. After careful review, we affirm.

Our standard of review in equity matters is narrow. We will reverse only when the chancellor has committed an error of law or has abused his or her discretion. See: Sack v. Feinman, 489 Pa. 152, 165-166, 413 A.2d 1059, 1066 (1980); Roberson v. Davis, 397 Pa.Super. 292, 295, 580 A.2d 39, 40 (1990); Hostetter v. Hoover, 378 Pa.Super. 1, 6, 547 A.2d 1247, 1249-1250 (1988), allocatur denied, 523 Pa. 642, 565 A.2d 1167 (1989). The chancellor…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sack v. FeinmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Felmlee v. LockettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. In Re Estate of HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Caveny v. CurtisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Hostetter v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arcadia Petroleum Ltd. v. Sun International Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  2. Arcadia Petroleum Ltd. v. Sun International Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API