Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arcadia Petroleum Ltd. v. Sun International Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 18, 2006No. 05-1259Unpublished

1Dissent

AMBRO, Circuit Judge, Dissenting:

Arcadia brought this lawsuit to enforce two agreements reached by written corre*169spondence with Sun in September and October of 2000. The District Court offered two rationales for why Arcadia cannot do so and my colleagues in the majority follow an alternative course to reach the same conclusion. I cannot follow any of the various paths of reasoning taken to this conclusion, as I believe they misconstrue contract law. I respectfully dissent.

After performing the first delivery of oh, Arcadia made a claim under the parties’ charter agreement for one amount of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Sunbeam Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Gustine Uniontown Associates, Ltd. Ex Rel. Gustine Uniontown, Inc. v. Anthony Crane Rental, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Cohen v. SabinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Yoder v. T. F. Scholes, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API