Legal Opinion

State v. Spinks

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 6, 1987No. 1 CA-CR 9207PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIDEL, Judge.

The charges against the appellant-defendant Clifford C. Spinks included perjury before a state grand jury. At trial the state was permitted to place transcribed portions of grand jury testimony into evidence, some of it from witnesses who did not appear at trial. The transcripts were not admitted for the truth of the testimony that they contained. Rather, they were admitted to demonstrate, through questions posed to a number of grand jury witnesses, that the defendant’s allegedly perjurious testimony concerned a subject material to the grand jury’s inquiry. The defendant…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Tennessee v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. State v. FodorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. London v. Green Acres TrustCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  5. State v. BaltzellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API