Legal Opinion

Dee v. Foster

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Reserved Question erom Circuit Court, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

*2OPINION OF THE COURT BY

ROBERTSON, C.J.

This is an action of ejectment for the recovery of certain land at Makolelau, Molokai. The case was being tried in the court below, jury-waived, when the court reserved for the consideration of this court the question hereinafter stated.

It is made to appear that on April 24, 1900, the plaintiff in this case and others, stockholders in the Kamalo Sugar Company, Limited, acting for the corporation upon the refusal of the directors of the company to take action, commenced a suit in equity against Frank H. Foster, the husband of the defendant in this case,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Clements v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Smith v. . ReidNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Sands v. CodwiseCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1808
  4. Helms v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Brasie v. Minneapolis Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Achiles v. Cajigals.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Bertelmann v. LucasHawaii Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Consolidated Rendering Co. v. MartinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929
  4. Hoffschlaeger Co. v. JonesHawaii Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Lewers & Cooke, Ltd. v. JonesHawaii Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API