Legal Opinion
Hoffschlaeger Co. v. Jones
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided November 23, 1917No. 1040PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from District Magistrate of Honolulu.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
QUARLES, J. (Robertson, C.J., dissenting.)
The plaintiff commenced this action in the district court of Honolulu against Arthur H. Jones, his wife Juliette M. Jones, and p. F. Turin, to recover the value of materials furnished by plaintiff to said Turin as contractor to be used in and actually used in the construction of a certain building constructed by said contractor under contract with defendant Arthur H. Jones upon certain described premises. The amended complaint among other things alleges:
“That on to wit the said 26th day of September, A. D. 1914, said Arthur H.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harrison v. McCandlessHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
- Lucas v. RedwardHawaii Supreme Court · 1893
- Dee v. FosterHawaii Supreme Court · 1912
- Gross v. DalyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1875
- Kenny v. GageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tanaka v. NagataHawaii Supreme Court · 1994