Legal Opinion

Benson v. Central Pacific Railroad

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1893No. 13290PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

This action is brought by the plaintiff, an infant, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by her while walking upon the roadway of defendant, by being run into by a locomotive operated by defendant.

The case was tried by a jury, which returned a verdict for defendant, and the appeal is from the judgment and from an order refusing a new trial.

Plaintiff’s evidence tended to prove the following facts:—

Plaintiff, a child of but six years of age, with her father and the other members of her family, took passage on a train of defendant for Watt’s Station,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. DoaneIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Franklin v. Southern California Motor Road Co.California Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Adams v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  5. Winkler v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1886

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Keena v. United Railroads of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Queirolo v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Hunton v. California Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Ingham v. Luxor Cab Co.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Ky. & Ind. Bridge & R. R. v. BucklerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API