City of St. Louis v. Whitley
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Commissioner.
The City of St. Louis instituted this suit in equity for an accounting and to recover city funds covinously dissipated and illegally paid out and received by the defendants. The trial court sustained' the defendants’ motions to dismiss the city’s petition and upon the city’s refusal to plead further entered a final judgment in favor of the defendants. Upon this appeal by the city the question for decision is whether its petition, “so construed as to do substantial justice”, V.A.M.S. Section 509.250, states “a claim upon which relief can be granted”. V.A.M.S. Sections…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bride v. City of SlaterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Lamar Township v. City of LamarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- State v. WeatherbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fish v. FishMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Mashak v. PoelkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- Stewart v. Town of WatertownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Opinion No. (1996), Missouri Attorney General Reports1996
- Opinion No. 176-77 (1977), Missouri Attorney General Reports1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.