Legal Opinion · Dissent

Terry A. ZENKER, Appellant, v. Otis BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 14, 1989No. 88-5204Published

1DissentHeaney, Senior Circuit Judge

The administrative record in this case clearly establishes that Zenker cannot perform his present job as a dishwasher at the Elks Lodge on a full-time basis. As the majority concedes, Zenker’s wife, employer, rehabilitation counselor and treating physician all testified to this fact. In light of this testimony, I cannot understand how the majority can deny Zenker the benefits to which he is entitled. For this reason, I respectfully dissent.

In the face of substantial contradicting evidence, the majority argues that Zenker must be denied benefits because he stated at the administrative hearing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gavin v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  2. Nancy E. CLARKE, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  3. William PIERCY, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health & Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  4. Joseph A. IAMARINO, Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary, Health & Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API