Legal Opinion

Morgan v. County of Yolo

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 8, 2008No. 06-16487PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Dave Morgan appeals the district court’s judgment on the pleadings in favor of the County of Yolo in his action alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We affirm.

*735Morgan seeks damages and attorney’s fees under the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), asserting that a reimbursement provision in his employment contract rendered his last work week’s wages “unpaid.” None of Morgan’s wages have been deducted or returned to the County, and Morgan has presented no evidence that he actually “banked” any of his wages in anticipation of reimbursing the County. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Kremens v. BartleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Rli Ins. Co. v. City of VisaliaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  2. (PC) Williams v. PriceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. (PS) Horn v. Experis US, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. (PS) Schmitz v. AsmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. Amaro v. Bee Sweet Citrus, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2024

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API