Legal Opinion

(PS) Schmitz v. Asman

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 24, 2024No. 2:20-cv-00195Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 THOMAS SCHMITZ, et al., No. 2:20-cv-00195-DJC-CKD (PS) 11 Plaintiffs, 12 v. ORDER AND 13 ADAM ASMAN, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 Plaintiffs Dianne Mallia and Thomas Schmitz proceed without counsel under

42 U.S.C. § 18

1983, individually and as successors of interest to the estate of their son, William Schmitz. This 19 matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 In the motion presently before the court, plaintiff Mallia…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Toguchi v. Soon Hwang ChungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API