Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Blakeley

California Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 2000No. S062453Published

1Dissent

MOSK, J.—

I dissent.

I address an “important” question (People v. Breverman (1998) 19 Cal.4th 142, 184, fn. 1 [77 Cal.Rptr.2d 870, 960 P.2d 1094] (dis. opn. of Mosk, J.)) that I had heretofore “decline [d] to consider ... in detail and in depth” (19 Cal.4th at p. 184, fn. 1; accord, People v. Lee (1999) 20 Cal.4th 47, 70, fn. 1 [82 Cal.Rptr.2d 625, 971 P.2d 1001] (dis. opn. of Mosk, J.)), namely, the “relationship between” the crimes of “murder and manslaughter” (People v. Breverman, supra, 19 Cal.4th at p. 184, fn. 1 (dis. opn. of Mosk, J.); accord, People v. Lee, supra, 20 Cal.4th at p. 70,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API