Liscomb State Savings Bank v. Akers

*707*706This is an action to recover tbe value of nineteen bead of cattle which, it is claimed, appellee purchased of *707appellant’s mortgagor. The controversy, on the merits, really resolves itself into two propositions: That is, were the cattle purchased by appellee from the , . , ^ n . ,, , n mortgagor included m the mortgage; and was the description therein contained so defective that the record did not impart constructive notice to intending purchasers? The full description is as follows:

‘ ‘ Twenty-four head stock steers of different sizes, ages and colors purchased of J. H. Buell & Co., Omaha,…