Hayes v. Campbell
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Sacramento, and from an order refusing a new. trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.
This case aaus in this court on a former appeal Arhen a iicav trial ayus ordered. The decision is reported in 55 Cal. p. 421. A new trial Ayas had, and judgment Avent for plaintiff. From that judgment, and from the order denying motion for neAv trial, defendant has appealed. The facts as boav presented are in some respects different from those presented on the former appeal.
The transcript sIioaa’s that the findings as to the following facts were agreed to by the parties:—
Plaintiff Avas the owner of the AAdieat in controversy. He shipped the Avheat October 18, 1874, by rail from Woodland, Yolo…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Henry J. Perkins Co. v. American Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Davis v. TrachslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Cottle v. CrockettCalifornia Superior Court · 1922