Legal Opinion

Cottle v. Crockett

California Superior Court

Decided March 10, 1922Published

Action in replevin by Albert Cottle v. Crete Amette Crockett. Judgment for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

In the Superior Court of the State of California,

In and for the County of Santa Clara.

Albert Cottle, Plaintiff, vs Crete Arnette Crockett, Defendant.

This is an action in replevin. The plaintiff claims to be the owner and entitled to the possession of certain personal property, consisting of fruit boxes, fruit trays, engine and spray pump etc., described and enumerated in his complaint, whice he alleges the defendant wrongfully, unlawfully, and without right, took from plaintiff and withholds from him after proper demand therefor by him.

At the trial of this action the following facts were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stetson v. BriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Stemler v. BassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Salter v. IvesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Thompson v. Green River Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  5. Solari v. ShowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API