Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rodriguez

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 18, 2000PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

The Commonwealth appeals from an order suppressing evidence obtained from a seizure of the defendant’s motor vehicle at a drug interdiction roadblock. At issue is *578whether the same policy concerns that make sobriety checkpoints reasonable and therefore constitutional also exist with respect to drug interdiction roadblocks. A District Court judge concluded that, under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and art. 14 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights, the roadblock was unconstitutional. A single justice of this court allowed the Commonwealth’s application for an…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CatanzaroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. RodriguezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. FosterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. Roland R.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. CarkhuffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API