Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 3, 1995No. 94-0159PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.

Emanuel D. Miller, Enos S. Hershberger, David E. Yoder, Eli M. Zook, Eli E. Swartzentruber, Eli J. Zook, Levi E. Yoder and Jacob J.D. Hershberger (hereinafter "appellants") are mem*243bers of the Old Order Amish faith. They appeal from an order directing them to pay a forfeiture for their failure to display a red and orange triangular slow-moving vehicle (SMV) emblem on their horse-drawn buggies as required by § 347.245, Stats.1 The appellants argue that the SMV statute violates their rights to free exercise of religion guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution2 and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. State v. HershbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. NusbaumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tilton v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Jocz v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  4. State v. Mitchell L. ChristenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State v. Leevan RoundtreeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API