Legal Opinion

Buffalo Union Furnace Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 4, 1923No. 103PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, Circuit Judge.

The facts, as found below, so far as they affect decision, are not in dispute, and, in any event, on writ of error we do not review the facts. United States v. Benedict (C. C. A.) 280 Fed. 76, affirmed March 5, 1923, 43 Sup. Ct. 357, 67 L. Ed. -; American Concrete Steel Co. v. Hart (C. C. A.) 285 Fed. 322. Those findings of fact upon which the main controversy between the parties is predicated really involve certain questions of law, as will appear infra, and, if these questions were rightly construed, then the findings of fact necessarily followed.

The action brought by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. United States v. PfitschSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. United States v. BenedictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  4. American Concrete Steel Co. v. HartCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  5. National City Bank v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rumsey Mfg. Corp. v. United States Hoffman MacHinery Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  2. United States v. Skinner & Eddy CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1925
  3. Virginia Bridge & Iron Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Kirkconnell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  5. Puget Sound Machinery Depot v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API