Legal Opinion

Doe v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 24, 2004No. 03-1350PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

Although the underlying question presented by this case is whether the government’s ban on paying for certain kinds of abortions is unconstitutional, we do not reach the merits of that issue. Instead, we hold that we lack jurisdiction over the appeal from the district court’s judgment, and we therefore transfer the case to the court with jurisdiction over the appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

I

Plaintiff Jane Doe, the wife of a member of the armed services, became pregnant in early 2002. In July 2002, she received a diagnosis that her fetus…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  5. United States v. HohriSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Griswold v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. South Carolina v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
  3. Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds & Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  4. Target Training International, Ltd. v. LeeDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2014
  5. Fry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API