Legal Opinion
Satterwhite v. Harriman Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 2, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
•WOOLSEY, District Judge.
The exceptions of the plaintiff and of the defendants are hereby overruled. The special master’s report is in all respects confirmed and approved, and is hereby adopted as the opinion of the court in this aspect of the cause.
I. This opinion by the special master. Edward W. Bourne, Esq., rendered October 15, 1935, is as follows:'
On April 26, 1932, the plaintiff borrowed $300,000 from the defendant the Harriman National Bank & Trust Company of the city of New York, hereinafter referred to simply as the bank, and delivered to the bank 15,000 shares of the capital stock…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Markham v. . JaudonNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Baker v. . DrakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Galigher v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Schenck v. . State Line Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Baron v. Peoples Nat. Bank of SecaucusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Benjamin (Benn) Myzel v. Harry Fields, Benjamin (Benn) Myzel v. Samuel H. King, Benjamin (Benn) Myzel v. Rita Vertelney, Special Administratrix, Etc., Benjamin (Benn) Myzel v. Gordon M. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC v. SykesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020