Allen v. Public Service Co. of Indiana, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWiltrout, P. J.
Appellee has filed a motion to affirm the judgment of the court below by reason of deficiencies in appellant’s brief. While the brief does not strictly comply with Rule 2-17, there was a good faith effort to comply, resulting in a substantial compliance so that the court is able to understand the questions sought to be presented and the points made. The motion to affirm is overruled.
A demurrer was sustained to appellant’s complaint on the ground that his action was one properly brought before the Industrial Board.
The complaint alleges that appellee, a public utility corporation, owns and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Seaton v. United States Rubber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1945
- Wasmuth-Endicott Co. v. KarstIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
- Harshman v. Union City Body Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1938
- Runion v. Indiana Glass Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1938
- Markham v. Hettrick Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Miller, Etc. v. Ortman, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Stainbrook v. JOHNSON CTY. F. BUR., ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1954
- Brewington v. Radio Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1962