Legal Opinion

State Bank v. Ensminger

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1844PublishedCited by 11 opinions

ERROR to the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDewet, J.

— Ensminger sued the state bank in assumpsit for money- had and received. Plea, general issue. There was also a plea of the statute of limitations, replication thereto, and issue. A jury having been called, and the plaintiff having made some progress in his testimony, it was agreed *106by the parties to withdraw the cause from the jury and submit it to the Court, and that the only issue to be tried should be, whether the defendant had received usurious interest from the plaintiff, and how much. The cause was accordingly submitted to the Court, who found for the plaintiff, and rendered judgment in…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wheaton v. HibbardNew York Supreme Court · 1822

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wood v. LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Baum v. ThomsIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Heiserman v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  4. Lee v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Harbaugh v. TannerIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API