Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Perkins

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 7, 1988No. 892PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence imposed after appellant pleaded guilty to driving under the influence (DUI). Appellant claims that the trial court erred in determining that the Commonwealth proved by a preponderance of the evidence that appellant had a prior DUI conviction in New York equivalent to the Pennsylvania charge of DUI. We agree and remand for a hearing consistent with this opinion.

On January 9, 1987, as a result of a one-car accident that occurred on January 6, 1987, appellant was charged with driving under the influence, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3731(a)(1),…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BoettcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. KearnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. LarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KimmelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. MedleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. WhisnantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Com. v. Good, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Com. v. Johnstone, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API