Commonwealth v. Perkins
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence imposed after appellant pleaded guilty to driving under the influence (DUI). Appellant claims that the trial court erred in determining that the Commonwealth proved by a preponderance of the evidence that appellant had a prior DUI conviction in New York equivalent to the Pennsylvania charge of DUI. We agree and remand for a hearing consistent with this opinion.
On January 9, 1987, as a result of a one-car accident that occurred on January 6, 1987, appellant was charged with driving under the influence, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3731(a)(1),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. BoettcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. KearnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. LarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KimmelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. MedleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. WhisnantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Com. v. Good, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Com. v. Johnstone, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.