Legal Opinion

Clinkscales v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 20, 1960No. 38461PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carlisle, Judge.

The first ground of the plea in abatement raises the question plainly and simply of whether or not a valid indictment has been returned when the same is returned at a time when the court is presided over by a disqualified judge. It is clear under the facts recited in the plea that the manner in which the special presentment was returned into' court was in accordance with all of the requirements of the law as to' the valid return of an indictment. Danforth v. State, 75 Ga. 614, 620 (58 Am. Rep. 480); Zugar v. State, 194 Ga. 285, 286 (21 S. E. 2d 647). The judge was on the bench…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Danforth v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  2. Cargile v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  3. State v. WaymireOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Cadle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. Zugar v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Orkin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  4. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  5. James C. Sweeney v. R. P. Balkcom, Jr., WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API