Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (2001)

Missouri Attorney General Reports

Decided February 16, 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Henry Hungerbeeler, Director Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission 221 Bolivar Street, Ste. 400 P.O. Box 270 Jefferson City, MO 65102

Dear Mr. Hungerbeeler:

This is in response to your questions asking:

1. May the State's share of state revenues derived from highway users be used to make Hancock Amendment refunds?

2. Does the "and making refunds" provision of Section 30(a) and the "and less refunds" provision of Section 30(b)1 include Hancock Amendment refunds or are such refunds limited to the refund of taxes "collected with respect to fuel not used for propelling highway motor…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kleban v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Spradlin v. City of FultonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. Kelly v. HansonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  4. Missouri Ass'n of Counties v. WilsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  5. Ederer v. DaltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API