Legal Opinion
City of Centralia v. Natkin & Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 3, 1994No. 5-92-0688PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Maag
This is an interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 307(a)(1) (134 Ill. 2d R. 307(a)(1)), from an order of the circuit court of Marion County which denied the motion of defendant-appellant, Nat-kin & Company, to stay judicial proceedings and compel arbitration. The trial court granted the motion of plaintiff-appellee, City of Centralia, to stay arbitration. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse.
On July 6, 1988, the City of Centralia (the City) and Natkin & Company (Natkin) entered into a written contract wherein Natkin agreed to furnish all materials, supplies, tools,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,309 Clarance B. Dickinson, a v. Heinold Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Futures, Inc. v. BarrIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- J&K Cement Construction, Inc. v. Montalbano Builders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Applicolor, Inc. v. Surface Combustion Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966
- Landmark Properties, Inc. v. Architects International-ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bishop v. We Care Hair Development Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Travis v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Schroeder Murchie Laya Associates, Ltd. v. 1000 West Lofts, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Yandell v. Church Mut. Ins. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Reed v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.