Legal Opinion
Ozlek v. Postmaster Gen
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 19, 2007No. 06-2161UnpublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Michael Ozlek brought claims against the Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service under both the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Family and Medical Leave Act. The District Court granted the defendant’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on all claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b). For the reasons set forth below, we will affirm the decision of the District Court.
I
Because we write solely for the benefit of the parties, we will set forth only those facts necessary to our analysis.
Appellant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Katherine L. Taylor v. Phoenixville School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Krouse v. American Sterilizer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Hodgens v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Boandl v. GeithnerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- O'Donnell v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Luckiewicz v. PotterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Gardner v. KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- Hopkins v. City of WilmingtonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.