Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Miller Rubber Products Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1934No. 24275Published

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

The essential question for our determination is, did the petition state good and sufficient causes of action against the plaintiffs in error?

This case comes within the provisions of Section 8125, General Code, being also Section 20 of the Negotiable Instruments Law, reading as follows:

“When [where] the instrument contains or a person *75adds to his signature words indicating that he signs for or on behalf of a principal, or in a representative capacity, he is not liable on the instrument if he was duly authorized. But the mere addition of words describing him as an agent, or as filling a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jump v. SparlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. New Georgia National Bank of Albany, Georgia v. J. & G. LippmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Briel v. Exchange Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Miller v. RoachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. Somers v. HansonOregon Supreme Court · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API