Commonwealth v. Charleston
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
CONCURRING AND DISSENTING
OPINION BY
OLSON, J.:
I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part. I concur in the result reached by the learned majority with respect to Appellant’s claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for: failing to object to the prosecutor’s statement that he had a bad reputation for telling the truth; failing to object to the prosecutor’s closing argument; 1 and failing to seek a homicide by misadventure jury instruction. However, I believe that Appellant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing concerning his claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. WidmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. FearsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.