Legal Opinion
Kishida v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 15, 1991No. E007194PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDANIEL, J. *
The underlying action was filed to recover damages for serious personal injuries suffered by Ritsuko and Akishige Kishida (plaintiffs) when their automobile collided with another, fleeing from California Highway Patrol (CHP) units during a high-speed chase. The State of California (defendant) was named as such on the theory that the two CHP officers engaged in the chase had done so negligently and thereby caused the collision between plaintiffs and the fleeing criminal suspect.
Of particular significance to the appeal, the complaint alleged that, “At all times herein…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nunn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. City of TurlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Frazier, Dame, Doherty, Parrish & Hanawalt v. Boccardo, Blum, Lull, Niland, Teerlink & BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Lehto v. City of OxnardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Hooper v. City of Chula VistaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McDowell v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Payne v. City of PerrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Weaver v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Billester v. City of CoronaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Weiner v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.