East Asiatic/Plumrose v. Ritchie
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Defendant-Appellant East Asiatic/Plum-rose ("Plumrose") appeals an award of benefits under the Workmen's Compensation Act ("the Act") to Plaintiff-Appellee David Rit-chie ("Ritchie").
We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
ISSUES
Ritchie raises two issues for our review, which we restate as:
1. Whether the Worker's Compensation Board ("the Board") had jurisdiction to make an award.
2. Whether the Board's award of total disability benefits was supported by specific findings of fact.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On July 6, 1988, Ritchie suffered an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Perez v. United States Steel Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Duvall v. ICI Americas, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Duncan v. George Moser Leather Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- White v. Woolery Stone Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Prentoski v. Five Star Painting, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Stytle v. Angola Die Casting Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Stump Home Specialties Manufacturing v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Prentoski v. Five Star Painting, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005