Legal Opinion

East Asiatic/Plumrose v. Ritchie

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 1995No. 93A02-9503-EX-167PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Defendant-Appellant East Asiatic/Plum-rose ("Plumrose") appeals an award of benefits under the Workmen's Compensation Act ("the Act") to Plaintiff-Appellee David Rit-chie ("Ritchie").

We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

ISSUES

Ritchie raises two issues for our review, which we restate as:

1. Whether the Worker's Compensation Board ("the Board") had jurisdiction to make an award.

2. Whether the Board's award of total disability benefits was supported by specific findings of fact.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On July 6, 1988, Ritchie suffered an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Perez v. United States Steel Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Duvall v. ICI Americas, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Duncan v. George Moser Leather Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. White v. Woolery Stone Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Prentoski v. Five Star Painting, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Stytle v. Angola Die Casting Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Stump Home Specialties Manufacturing v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Prentoski v. Five Star Painting, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API