Legal Opinion
Fidelity Nat. Bank of Baton Rouge v. Central Manufacturers Mut. Ins.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 22, 1950No. 3297PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DORÉ, Judge.
The plaintiff is a banking corporation-organized under the laws of the United States, with its domicile, and doing business, in the City of Baton Rouge. The defendant is a fire insurance company organized under the laws of the State of Ohio,, having its domicile in Van Wert, Ohio, but authorized to do, and doing business, in the State of Louisiana, with John B. Galloway, doing business as Mutual Insurance Agency, in the City of Baton Rouge, as its. duly authorized agent. The insurance company supplied Galloway with the necessary forms and he had the agent’s usual and customary…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Kelly v. IvlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- New England Acceptance Corp. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
- Home Life Insurance Company, New York, Cross-Appellant v. Equitable Equipment Company, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Bradford v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Keller v. KellerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969