Legal Opinion
Chamoy v. Schlesinger
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided February 11, 1974No. Civ. No. 73-3933Published
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
SAMUEL P. KING, District Judge.
Having exhausted all his administrative remedies, the Petitioner in this case seeks a Writ of Habeas Corpus, ordering the Respondents to discharge him from the United States Air Force as a conscientious objector. Federal jurisdiction exists under the First and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution and under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241 to 2243 (1971), and 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (1966).
Facts:
In 1968, Petitioner, a physician, entered the United States Air Force as a commissioned officer pursuant to the Berry Plan, a special program for potential…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Gillette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Application of John Michael Speer v. Commander G. H. HedrickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Louis A. Negre v. Stanley R. Larsen, Commanding General Sixth United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- In the Matter of Lieutenant Commander Elliott R. Tressan, Mc, Usnr, 715355/2105 v. Hon. Melvin Laird, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.