Legal Opinion
Ohio Cellular Products Corp. v. Adams USA, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 26, 1999No. 98-1448PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MICHEL. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge PAULINE NEWMAN.
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
Ohio Cellular Products Corporation (“Ohio Cellular”) and Donald Nelson (“Nelson”)1 appeal from the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, granting Adams USA, Inc. and Apehead Manufacturing, Inc.’s (“Defendants’ ”) post-judgment motion for leave to amend their third-party complaint to add Nelson in his individual *1345capacity as a third-party defendant. See Ohio Cellular Prods. Corp. v. Adams USA, Inc., No. 3:94-CV-7251…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jacobsen v. OsborneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Francisco Hernandez Jimenez v. Astol Calero ToledoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Iris Connex, LLC v. Dell, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2017
- Dragon Intellectual Property LLC v. Dish Network L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
- Ulead Systems, Inc. v. Lex Computer & Management Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2001
- Crude Co. v. United States Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- In Re Neurontin Marketing & Sales Practices Lit.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.