Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Hudgens

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 15, 1933No. 13,307PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiff in error is hereinafter referred to as Gilbert and defendant in error as Hudgens.

Gilbert sued Hudgens in a justice of the peace court on a promissory note for $103, payable at $10 per month, and attached an automobile. The suit was- dismissed at plaintiff’s costs and an appeal was taken to the county court. There it was tried to' the court, without a jury. General findings were for Hudgens and he had judgment for costs and the dissolution of the attachment. To review that judgment Gilbert prosecutes this writ and asks that it be made a supersedeas. Both parties request final…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. J. E. French Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Atlas Securities Co. v. CopelandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Beneficial Loan & Investment Co. v. IraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  4. Rice v. Franklin Loan & Finance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  5. McCraw v. WelchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dunn v. Midland Loan Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. L. L. Stroud and John A. Gillies v. B-W Acceptance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  3. Cady L. Daniels, Inc. v. FentonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  4. Lederman Enterprises, Inc. v. Westinghouse Credit Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1972
  5. Cady L. Daniels, Inc. v. FentonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API