Legal Opinion

Atlas Securities Co. v. Copeland

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 5, 1927No. 27,359PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*394The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The action was one in replevin by a chattel mort- ' gagee to recover possession of an automobile. The defense was that the chattel mortgage was tainted with usury and therefore void. Plaintiff prevailed and defendant appeals.

Defendant purchased a Stutz car from the Hathaway Motor Company in Kansas City, Mo., June 16,1922. A contract was executed, reading in part:

“First party guarantees its new cars as per printed guarantee in regular factory catalogue. Second party hereby orders from first party the articles enumerated below at the prices…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex inf. Hadley v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Smith v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  3. Huber Manufacturing Co. v. EllisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dennis v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Johnson v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Manufacturers Finance Trust v. StoneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929
  4. Cessna Finance Corp. v. Morrison, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  5. Levine v. Nolan Motors, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API