Cloyd v. Dawson
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Presiding Judge.
The plaintiff, Iva Cloyd, appeals the granting of defendants’ separate motions to dismiss. The trial court ruled the judgment attacked collaterally by this quiet title action was not void and therefore sustained the motions to dismiss. The defendants, Bert Dawson, Madge Fancher, and Watie Pettit, individually and as administrator of the estate of Pearl Dawson, are alleged to hold an interest in property adverse to the plaintiff by virtue of a judgment of the District Court of Rogers County. This appeal from the sustained motion to dismiss alleges one proposition of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Scoufos v. FullerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Woodrow v. EwingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Seminole County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Viersen v. BoettcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Porter v. HansenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.