Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Kamas
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 14, 1994No. 90-1267-MLBPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BELOT, District Judge.
This case comes before the court on the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) motion for summary judgment against defendants Joan D. Kamas, Daniel M. Carney, Victor W. Schlesinger, and Loekeford Ethanol Corporation, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. (Doc. (57) FDIC, the receiver of Boulevard State Bank of Wichita (Boulevard), filed this action to recover on certain promissory notes and guaranties executed by the defendants.
Albert Kamas1 executed and delivered to Boulevard promissory notes in the amount of $860,000, $50,000, and $150,000, on May…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franks v. NimmoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Ritchie Enterprises v. Honeywell Bull, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Iola State Bank v. BiggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.